Science & religion can co-exist
Re: “No evidence equals no belief,” Feb.
To the Editor:
While I recognize that, to a non-believer like yourself, the
Bible, Torah or Qur’an seem dogmatic, they all contain
similar ground: a belief in a higher power, or in God. I
am the product of parents who subscribe to two completely
different religions, and I can’t say I believe in one
more than the other. My view is therefore not to support
a specific religion, but to support the existence of a higher
In your letter you have made the point that “science
is your religion” and that this view does not conform
with a belief in God. Fair enough, but what of the multitudes
of scientists who, through their exploration into fact and
truth, are inevitably confronted with the question of creationism
and the beginning of time? Many renowned minds from your scientific
community come to the conclusion that God must exist.
Albert Einstein believed in “the presence of a superior
reasoning power” that could explain the beginning of
time and the laws of the universe. Isaac Newton credits a belief
in God when asked about the developments of his laws of motion
and gravity. Stephen Hawking’s conclusions in A Brief
History of Time point to the connection between a finite universe
(one that started with the Big Bang) and the existence of God.
The inference that facts which are un-quantifiable or un-qualifiable
become trite leaves no room for a discussion in the belief
of love, morality or consciousness. These are three things
you describe as being “vacant of physical evidence.” But,
to me, they’re just as real as anything physical in this
To the Editor:
There is a God.
I’m a student of science and I can affirm that, although
science gave us many facts, it’s far from indisputable.
The entire process of science is to take existing theories
and dismantle them; that is how Nobel prizes are won. In fact,
no theory is scientifically valid unless it can be proven wrong.
The fact that different religions have different concepts
of God doesn’t mean anything. People have conflicting
ideas about what love is, what political system works best
and why the Toronto Maple Leafs haven’t won the Stanley
Cup in years. So naturally, something as infinite as God will
generate more disagreement. That so many wars were fought over
religion doesn’t say religion was to blame, because humans
fight wars over anything; religion was just a handy excuse.
If you want evidence of God, don’t look in the Bible,
but at the complexity of your circulatory system, the light
receptors in your retina or the enzymes in your pancreas. If
you choose to believe they came about by chance, and stayed
there because of natural selection, then you should know that
the late Dr. Stephen Gould, the world’s leading evolution
expert (and a confirmed atheist) once said that all of evolution
was a huge fluke. Dr. Harold Morowitz of Yale University calculated
the odds of one human evolving at 1 in 10 to the power of 1,250,000,000,000.
But if you don’t believe in God, I respect that. Because
for you to believe that life on Earth came about due to an
infinitesimal fluke requires as much blind faith as believing
Listen to Lyndon B.
Re: “Dubya rules,” Feb. 13, 2004
To the Editor:
To quote Lyndon B. Johnson, “a president’s hardest
task is not to do what is right, but to know what is right.”
Very few people would deny Saddam Hussein was a brutal dictator
and Iraq (and ultimately the world) is a better place now that
he is no longer in power. However, this still fails to justify
the military action taken by Coalition Forces. Disregarding
the questionable motives surrounding the war, the thousands
of civilian deaths and the Pandora’s box of forced regime
change, the key issue lies in the fact the war in Iraq was
an illegal war and threatens the credibility and future of
the United Nations.
We find ourselves in a time when countries such as China or
India could very well become superpowers within the next 20
years. We desperately need organizations such as the United
Nations firmly in place to ensure international security and
to prohibit the violation of global human rights. Prime Minister
Paul Martin made this clear when he chose to meet with UN Secretary
General Kofi Annan before meeting with President Bush in January
of this year.
Thus, for the aforementioned reasons, contrary to what ‘some’ may
naively believe, the war in Iraq has actually been a major
threat to world peace, as opposed to securing it.
Ashkan (Sean) Shoamanesh
To the Editor:
Ken and Barbie were both longtime friends of most girls,
and Ken was the man that set the standard for all men.
Unfortunately, on Feb. 12, 2004 after a strong 43-year
relationship, they broke up. Some say Barbie may be going
through a mid-life crisis, but I believe Barbie just got
bored and wanted something new and exciting. Barbie has
started seeing a young, boogie-boarding Australian named
Blaine, who is nowhere near as hot as Ken. He’s more
of a punk, bad ass, beach bum.
As a child, I was a huge fan of getting Barbie ready and dressed
for a night on the town with Ken. He would pick her up in his
hot pink Jeep and show her a nice night and bring her back
at a respectable time. I don’t know about anyone else,
but I am deeply offended by this change in men.
How can Mattel just dump Ken like that and replace him with
someone that cannot compare? Ken was an amazing guy and just
because he wasn’t prepared for marriage doesn’t
mean Barbie should just leave him on the side of the road.
Some men are afraid of the final commitment, but come on Barbie,
why just throw all that down the drain?
Hopefully, Barbie will notice Blaine is just another player
looking for a piece of ass, and Ken was the real thing.
Don't like it? Don't read it
Re: “Taking issue with the Sex Issue,” Feb. 18,
To the Editor:
I would like to congratulate all offended readers of the sex
issue for ruining it for the rest of us. Although not all
students at this school choose this apparently mortifying
and appalling lifestyle, but many students do — I am
one of them.
The issue of The Gazette directing the sex issue only to the
heterosexual male population at this school is a crock. I am
a full out heterosexual female and I read it cover to cover
as I saw many women doing at this school last Friday. Do you
really think everyone who read it sat there starring at the
cover trying to absorb all its content? No, they flipped through
it like they do every paper. Who cares about the cover, really?
A person’s time at university should be one of the best
of their lives —for most readers, sex will be part of
it whether you like it or not.
I think of myself as an intelligent, athletic and fun women.
I do like to have sex, as do most people at this school, including
women, men, your profs, your TAs, your cafeteria lady and the
guy that sits next to you in whatever class you take.
This is not a time to play the feminist card. People have
sex and want to read about it… you don’t like
it? Don’t read it.
This is just like when I was a kid and my mom made this gross
casserole. I’d complain and tell her how gross it was,
and she would just tell me, “You don’t like it?
Don’t eat it.”
Shut up about it and let the rest of us enjoy it!
Civil Engineering II
The USC: money-thieving and useless?
To the Editor:
What does the University Students’ Council do exactly?
I mean, aside from $500 from me each of the last four years.
I know they do some charity work and donate money to some
clubs. But if I wanted to donate money to charity I would,
and if I wanted to join some clubs, I’d pay for that
too. (Last time I checked, you need to pay to join most clubs
Why do I need to give money to the USC to donate to charities
when I could donate to the charities directly (and that’s
if I wanted to)?
Apparently, the USC runs the University Community Centre,
The Wave and The Spoke. Well, aside from the athletic facilities,
which I admit are great, the UCC is crap. The Spoke and the
Wave are always in financial trouble and are complete dumps.
I’ve heard the USC lobbies the government to lower tuition
fees and discuss other things that concern the average student
at Western, but tuition fees have gone up every year I’ve
been here. I know next to nothing about student politics, but
I do know others also have no idea what the USC does. I don’t
know anyone on the USC, so I am asking anyone who knows, what
does the USC do and why does it deserve my money?